Can The United States Justify The Civil War :: essays research papers

Can the United States Justify the Civil War     The definition of distinct Destiny reads as "The belief in the 1840sin the inevitable territorial expansion of the United States, especially asadvocated by s bring outhern slaveholders who wished to extend slavery into newterritories." This explanation was transcribed from the World BookEncyclopedias dictionary. It is directly evident that from this unbiasedstatement we can trace the first uprising of a divert group of people yearningto break the newly formed bond of the great United States.     Before and during the Mexican War, the people who were pushing for theclaimed land formerly owned by innocent native americans, were always looking for ascapegoat. They needed one way or another, a way to squirm out of taking theblame for the enslaved and murdered Mexican causalities. There was one man,though, who would not let this happen, David Wilmot. David Wilmot was ademocrat from Pennsyl vania, who was willing to revise the Presidents bill. Inthis revision, Wilmot proposed "...neither slavery nor forced servitudeshall ever exist in any part of the territory...". This was not well liked bythe South and eventhough it was given thumbs up many times in the senate, ournewly formed rustic was now bordered by fresh land. The Wilmot Provisounderwent quite a bit of pressure so that compromises could satisfy all(prenominal) side.     The Compromise of 1850 was soon to follow but the real catch of the sameyear was the Fugitive Slave Act. This act was invented so that the slaves ofslaveowners, who took them to a slave-free state on a vacation or something,could not escape. In this act, the hardest part to understand, was that thecourts were to try to give a fair trial to any runaway slaves. This enfuriatedmany of the Yankee abolitionists who now were going to expand the tracks ofthe underground railroad to help extend their efforts in the rescue of therunaways. The point of no return, where many people knew for sure that thecountry would be devided between the north and the south was the ruling on theKansas Nebraska Act. This act was majorly contributed into by Stephen A.Douglas and probably would never have passed without his consent. The wholeidea asshole the act that really got to the south was Popular Sovereignty. Thisso called "specific" rule was none to specific in stating when a territory coulddecide when they were pro or anti slavverry. The abolitionists were floodingthe new territory with their own kind where as the southerners were just moving